On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:21 PM Maxwell G <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been thinking about the Changes Process recently and how we can > improve it for Change Owners, Change Wranglers, FESCo members, and > participants in Change discussion and feedback. >
I would also like to suggest that if/when a consequential change is made in a change proposal (reasonings, justifications, scope of work, perhaps others?) that the current change proposal is rendered moot and a new one must be proposed for discussion (which would be allowed to be resubmitted after the usual deadlines as long as the essential original intent is maintained (unlike some US Congress bills where the entire text is replaced for a completely different law or purpose to skip certain steps). Yes, consequential is in the eye of the beholder, but I think we would know it when we see it (and a few recent change proposals have, in my eye, changed consequentially during the proposal).
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
