On 2026-03-06 06:18, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 44 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:LC_ALL=en dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-syncThis command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in next Fedora. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is lots of "Fails to install" (F44FailsToInstall) reports:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2384425&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2384425&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced>For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines on renaming and replacing packages:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packagesI myself discovered lots of issues. But after running `remove-retired-packages` **before** running the `dnf distro-sync` it boils down to these three:Problem 1: installed package ant-openjdk21-1.10.15-32.fc43.noarch requires java-21-openjdk-headless, but none of the providers can be installed - java-21-openjdk-headless-1:21.0.10.0.7-2.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository- problem with installed packageProblem 2: installed package kdelibs-webkit-6:4.14.38-49.fc43.x86_64 requires kdelibs(x86-64) = 6:4.14.38-49.fc43, but none of the providers can be installed - kdelibs-6:4.14.38-49.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository- problem with installed packageProblem 3: cannot install both ldc-libs-1:1.41.0-3.fc44.x86_64 from fedora and ldc-libs-1:1.42.0-2.fc44.x86_64 from updates-testing - package glibd-2.4.3-7.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires libdruntime-ldc-shared.so.111()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package glibd-2.4.3-7.fc44.x86_64 from fedora requires libphobos2-ldc-shared.so.111()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package ldc-libs-1:1.40.0-3.fc42.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glibd-2.4.3-4.fc42.x86_64You can try to add to command line: I will open 3 issues in BZ for each specific component. Thank you Miroslav
As tested with "LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 dnf --releasever=44 --enablerepo=*-testing -- assumeno --best distro-sync"
Transaction Summary: Installing: 105 packages Reinstalling: 1 package Upgrading: 3927 packages Replacing: 3945 packages Removing: 5 packages Downgrading: 6 packages Total size of inbound packages is 8 GiB. Need to download 8 GiB. After this operation, 2 GiB will be freed (install 23 GiB, remove 25 GiB). Operation aborted by the user. As expected RPM Fusion updates-released mirrors are currently inactive. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer
OpenPGP_0x529982C2682F5484.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
