Am 04.09.25 um 18:39 schrieb [email protected]:
If you are CCed on this mail, then action is required (mat2) or recommended (libavif, jpegxl, gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra, webp-pixbuf-loader).I propose some*mildly* disruptive changes for the gdk-pixbuf2 package in rawhide and also F43. (I was tempted to do this only in rawhide, but the F43 package is not in great state currently, and I think it's probably best to just push forward here.)
Is there rebuilt of gdk-pixbuf2 against 2.0.rc version of glycin planed to support latest changes to fix https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glycin/-/issues/175 ?
Otherwise my package (mate-utils) is already rebuild to support gdk-pixbuf2-2.43.3-7.fc44/43 ;-)
regards
Wolfgang
gdk-pixbuf2-2.43.3-7.fc44
<https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2801124>
OpenPGP_0x0C0B57D962C87B8D.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
