On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 10:32 AM Jonathan Steffan
<jonathanstef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> memtest86+ is already at the latest version. We automatically monitor 
> upstream and have been responsive for updates. If you have any issues with 
> the package please file a bug. :)
>
> We are unable to sign these builds due to the requirements for the secure 
> boot signing process. If there is ever a Fedora key that can sign builds and 
> users can trust that key, we might be able to in the future. This is out of 
> scope for the memtest86+ package.
>
> The "memtest=N" boot argument should be working. This was enabled per 
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2385. This is not 
> as thorough of testing compared to memtest86+, but it's great for a quick 
> sanity check.
>

It is possible to request Fedora to sign it. You will probably need to
make some packaging changes to support it, but it can be done.

You can file a ticket with releng to get it done.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to