On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:40:51 +0200
Dan Horák <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:07:40 -0600
> Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
> > >> Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that
> > >> may have been the reason why ucx failed to patch properly.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks - is this already being tracked somewhere?
> > >
> > > Sandro
> > >
> >
> > It seems to be affecting a number of packages, netcdf as well.
> >
> > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/netcdf
> >
> > do we know what is responsible so we can file an issue?
>
> the root cause is ucx, which is affecting other packages via openmpi
I am preparing an upstream ucx ticket right now ...
Dan
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
