On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 4:40 AM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 10:20, Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Neal (and Dusty), >> >> On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: >> > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and >> > offers more modern file system features that can be utilized in the >> > future. >> >> Reading some through some of the thread it seems the main motivation is >> consolidation of tooling across the OCI, RHEL, and (through OCI) Flatpak >> landscape. Could you maybe add that little blurb to the change proposal >> wiki? > > > Is OCI moving towards erofs or is it just because of composefs based > containers? >
Support for EROFS based layers are being discussed to replace tarball layers[1]. I am optimistic that they will move to it. However, I believe currently the drive from the RH/FCOS side is due to composefs. [1]: https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/issues/1190 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
