On 2025-01-15 20:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
TBH we haven't had enough time since upstream gcc stage 1 close to finish going through all the failures[1]. If only we had a week or two more for the mass rebuild; it got delayed by a couple of weeks last year and a similar delay would have helped this year too.This might be a stupid question ... but if it would have helped you, then why wasn't a delay requested?
I had it in my TODO list to file a Fesco ticket for *future* even numbered Fedora, but I suppose I could have requested an additional week or so to file these issues even for F42. Most of the packages succeeded so I figured we could use the stabilization period following the rebuild (as we would do in F39 and earlier) to help iron out the failures that we couldn't cover during the prebuild and avoid a schedule slippage.
Sid -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
