On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 04:00:57PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 24 v 3:33 odp. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > Neat. This would allow to slap in some comments, right? E.g:
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> >
> > License: %{shrink:
> > %dnl src/*.*
> > MIT AND
> > BSL-1.0 AND %dnl doc/*.*
> > BSD-2-Clause AND
> > (Apache-2.0 OR MIT OR BSL-1.0)
> > }
>
> Technically yes, but please do not.
>
> There is already
>
> https://reuse.software/
>
> that has structure, documentation, linters, libraries...
>
> Somehow incorporating this would be great.
Proposing to switching RPMs to make use of reuse.software syntax
is a huge can of worms with no plausibly predictable date when
it could benefit maintainers, if ever.
Using %dnl for comments inside %shrink{...} is a trivial thing
that appears usable for maintainers today, with no blocking
factors in terms of packaging guidelines. If it makes someone's
life easier as a maintainer, I'd say go for it. There's no obvious
downside, and plausible upside.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
