> Today we have:
>
> * 24312 spec files in Fedora
>
> * 30925 license tags in all spec files
>
> * 5740 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
Soon we will have 5739 license tags left to update as I'm ready to
push a package update.
kcov bundles 3 javascript libraries in HTML reports so I ended up with
the following licenses:
- GPL-2.0-only (kcov itself)
- MIT (two js dependencies)
- GPL-2.0-only OR MIT (one dual-licensed js dependency)
I ended up with the following license tag that I moved to SPDX as part
of the incoming update:
License: GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT)
I feel like I could technically factor it to just "GPL-2.0-only AND
MIT" because picking either license in the dual-licensed js script
will effectively result in just that, but I kept the expanded license
tag to reflect the presence of a dual-licensed piece of software (and
because I saw nothing resembling this case in the guidelines).
What is the preferred expression here? Are they both correct?
Thanks,
Dridi
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
