On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:17:55AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > I can't see how this helps understand the Fedora contributor's preferences > about the use of AI, when the survey is restricting the possible answers > to "yes", "definitely yes", "very much yes". I would question the validity > of any actions taken / priorities set in Fedora based on results of this > survey.
I don't think this is quite fair, as "No" is an option for the first "Is AI/ML useful...." questions. But it does require trust that we will take the second question's responses in that context. That was our intention, but we should have allowed for explict negative responses in the second question, or made it contingent on positive responses to the first. -- Matthew Miller <[email protected]> Fedora Project Leader -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
