On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:40:15AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> In rpm 4.20 as currently available in rawhide, defining __debug_install_post
> seems to have no effect. The %mingw_package_header sets __debug_install_post
> as follows
>
> %mingw_package_header \
> %global __strip %{mingw_strip} \
> %global __objdump %{mingw_objdump} \
FWIW, I don't think these two overrides should be required
anymore. The standard strip/objdump commands in /usr/bin
work with PE files these days, and for the pacakges where
we have merged mingw+native specs these overrides aren't
used.
Given that, I'd question whether %mingw_package_header needs
to continue to exist either ? it is no harder / great lines
of code to simply call %mingw_debug_install_post in %install,
thus avoiding the rpm 4.20 compat issue.
> %global __debug_install_post %%{mingw_debug_install_post} \
> %{nil}
>
> but %mingw_debug_install_post is never executed. Manually running
>
> %mingw_debug_install_post
>
> in %install works however.
>
> Perhaps this is related to [1]? What is the correct way now to trigger the
> custom debug extraction script?
>
> Thanks
> Sandro
>
> [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2204
> --
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
