The suggestion for one of the comments of using `/run/fail2ban(/.*)?` instead of `/run/fail2ban.*` doesn't work?


On 5/4/24 13:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
I still don't understand SELinux and would appreciate an assist!

fail2ban-server is unable to create the socket file /run/fail2ban/fail2ban.sock

There's a lot of custom SELinux policies and I'm unable to figure out what needs to change.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279054 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279054> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272476 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272476>

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fail2ban/tree/rawhide <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fail2ban/tree/rawhide>

Thanks,
Richard

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to