As the mentioned patent clause is there for 10+ years I might just believe it went through Fedora Legal, as it is a much older legal related task than I am co-maintainer of the openexr itself.
But I am fine with having conversation with the Legal team about the proper SPDX license clause that should be used for this project. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:06 PM Gary Buhrmaster <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr > package in Fedora Rawhide and f40. > > > > I note that there is a patent clause which > allows DreamWorks to revoke the patent > grants under some conditions for the > lossy compression. > > Has Fedora Legal reviewed the revocable > patent license language, and does there > need to be a (new) SPDX license to include > that patent grant (BSD-3-Clause-Patent?) > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
