On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:15 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been converted, so in day-to-day work, I don't
> even think about %changelog. When working with other packages, I'll
> forget to update the Relase and/or %changelog. Today I was rebasing
> some pull requests in pagure, and the _only_ conflicts that I had
> were
> about Release and %changelog.
>
> I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely.
> Thus, the proposal:
> - new packages MUST use rpmautospec
> - packagers SHOULD convert their packages
> - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages
> (e.g. when they want to push some fix or separately from other
> work)
> - people submitting pull requests against src.fp.o MAY also
> include a conversion in the pull request and packagers SHOULD
> merge it.
>
> (FTR, 'rpmautospec convert' does the conversion, incl. the commit
> to dist-git. Manual conversion should not be used.)
I also still see some issues in %autorelease , why fix a typo is a new
release ?
in %{forgesource} , as I mention in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rawstudio/pull-request/2#comment-167038
"forge date should be the date of the last commit upstream of upstream
git (i.e. git log -1 --format=%cd --date=short | tr -d -)"
and the most important, I don't see "great" benefits and give me more
work .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
