On 30/03/2024 15.45, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30 2024 at 12:26:48 PM +00:00:00, Christopher Klooz
<[email protected]> wrote:
If I got Rich right, the malicious code is likely to be broken on F40,
No, that is not correct, as explained by [1] and [2]. We have already asked Red
Hat to investigate and fix the blog post. This is still an evolving situation;
apologies for the confusion as we sort this out.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BAO5S2VGTTWD6MHHCFHTAIAHZQFMOGAQ/
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BAO5S2VGTTWD6MHHCFHTAIAHZQFMOGAQ/
Then we must have had some communication snafu regarding the Fedora Magazine
article, because multiple people including myself flagged the incorrect
statement there before the article was published. Hopefully we can get one this
fixed, too.
Michael
Thanks for clarifying. I have already deleted the Fedora Magazine link from the
related Fedora Discussion topic [1] earlier, and now updated the rest. I re-add
the magazine article when it was fixed, I pinged Justin already some hours ago,
hopefully it gets updated soon.
[1]
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/attention-malicious-code-in-current-pre-release-testing-versions-variants-f40-and-rawhide-affected-users-of-f40-rawhide-need-to-respond/110683
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
