On 1/15/24 14:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
are* leaf packages:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ostree/c/af0a269 (correctly scoped
to RHEL>=10)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatpak/c/9e4df49 (correctly scoped
to RHEL>=10)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal/c/93310f7
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/c/940885b
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sssd/c/e0023ec
It looks like at least some of these changes were mistakenly pushed to
Rawhide while they should only apply to ELN / RHEL>=10?
I suspect that these packages dropping i686 support will cause a ton
of build failures during the upcoming mass rebuild.
As the author of the EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal - please
**DO NOT DO IT THIS WAY**. The Change Proposal was about dropping i686
builds from packages that are **LEAF PACKAGES**, not packages that are
somewhere deep in the distro's dependency tree.
Fabio
Thank you for checking sssd update.
Is there anything I should do to stop
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd from
landing in stable or is the negative karma enough?
I don't see "Actions" button to revoke it.
Thanks,
Pavel.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
