Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> This is called "shooting the messenger".
It is not. See my reply to Fabio.
> LSB requires various obsolete interfaces, in particular it requires
> Python 2 to be available as /usr/bin/python. Comment [1] contains a
> nice listing. We are not going to bring back Python 2 or old PERL
> modules to satisfy LSB.
That is exactly the attitude I am complaining about!
It would be very much possible to support the Python 2 parts of the spec,
without even shipping unmaintained software: Package Tauthon 2.8.4, and make
both /usr/bin/python and /usr/bin/python2 symlinks to /usr/bin/tauthon. That
should have been the Python 2 migration plan from the beginning, instead of
the package mass retirement spree that was done instead. (And Python 3
should never have been installed as /usr/bin/python. Scripts with
#!/usr/bin/python expect Python 2, silently replacing it with Python 3
breaks the scripts. Anything aware that a Python 3 exists uses, or at least
SHOULD use, #!/usr/bin/python3.)
But Fedora just does not care about keeping working software working.
> The decision of FESCo is to not claim compatibility when we don't provide
> it.
That makes sense, but the issue is the latter part, not the former.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
