On 15. 11. 23 16:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Am Mi., 15. Nov. 2023 um 15:31 Uhr schrieb Priscila Gutierres <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:I would like to maintain it, but I'm now just a contributor Can someone please sponsor me to allow me to become a maintainer and take this package? Priscila. On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:41 AM Tomáš Orsava <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I just orphaned pipenv: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipenv <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipenv> I haven't been using the package for some time, and upstream releases versions too fast for me to keep up. Also I'm not sure how many people use the package. There are two open BZs for the package, but they'll likely be resolved by updating to the latest upstream version. TomasLooking at the myriad of py packages which Fedora's pipenv bundles, I'm really wondering whether we should package this at all, at least in this form. I'm not saying that unbundling is easy or even feasible.
We used to unblundle it. It didn't work. We added the bundled things back one by one until we gave up.
The packaged pipenv is broken on Fedora 38 and Fedora 39 and nobody seems to be screaming about it. I think we should let it die.
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
