On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 05:01:15PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today.
> > After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on
> > i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i686 should be minimal,
>
> None at all, since we don't ship an i686 kernel. (Well, I suppose
> someone might be mad enough to try running gnumeric in an i686
> container or chroot on top of an x86-64 kernel, but why'd you want to
> do that ...)
A completely unnecessary nerdy over-the-top correction:
you don't need a container. Dnf will install a 32-bit variant of
packages when instructed to do so:
$ sudo dnf5 remove goffice.x86_64
$ sudo dnf5 install gnumeric.i686
$ file -L /usr/bin/gnumeric
/usr/bin/gnumeric: ELF 32-bit LSB pie executable, Intel 80386, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2,
BuildID[sha1]=193d0eb6fe9bd71cec29b46a7bdd372687a36d37, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0,
stripped
$ gnumeric
...
I imagine that somebody with a machine with little RAM might use a
32-bit program because it uses less memory… But I think it's not worth
the effort required to keep the 32-bit version alive (including all
dependencies).
> > I would
> > be inclined to just ExcludeArch: %{ix86} and move on.
Yeah.
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
