On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 8:26 AM Alexander Ploumistos <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > […] > > > > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a > > commit/build. > > A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never > happened: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374 > The task does not exist in koji. > > Could this be related?
It might, or might not. During past mass rebuilds, some failures (like intermittent network issues, or failure to parse spec files) caused no build to be launched, but also no failure to be recorded. If there's a package that's prone to cause issues, it might fail there *and* in anitya scratch builds. Looking at the spec file for liborigin, I see something that's definitely suspicious: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/liborigin/blob/rawhide/f/liborigin.spec#_12 i.e. the Source "https://downloads.sourceforge.net/%%{name}/%%{name}-%%{version}.tar.gz"; Looks like this line was previously commented out, then uncommented, but the double-%% for escaping macros were not removed. This might trip up parsing of the spec file, which is likely the cause of what made release monitoring fail here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374#c1 Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
