On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:55:36 +0000
Mattia Verga via devel <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
> under tons of posts.
>
> Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
> libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as
> RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only
> have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and
> would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos?
I am surely interested in the RPMs, mainly from the ppc64le (and s390x)
point of view. They are very unlikely to get flatpaks.
Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
