Neal Gompa wrote:
> Because the alternative is no Java runtime at all, and that's even
> less acceptable.
I do not see why the way the packaging used to work all these years could
not be kept unchanged.
The only issues that were pointed out were related to the Java TCK (that it
takes too long to run on every build, and that sometimes system libraries
cause failures in some obscure test that are hard to debug), to which the
obvious answer is to just stop running it and call the package something
other than the current java-*-openjdk. (My understanding as a non-lawyer is
that it should be enough to change the package Name and the Summary and
%description. The java-*-openjdk name could still be Obsoleted/Provided, and
the binaries do not have to be renamed either.)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
