Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Any particular position (in a large enough company like IBM, or RH) has
> about zero impact on any organization's profits.
Which is why they have laid off a whole bunch of people. They just happen to
not be as visible as the (now former) Fedora Program Manager.
> It *may* indicate priorities (which is a completely different discussion,
> and which you might, legitimately, ask if IBM and RH is committed, and at
> what level, to Fedora in the long term(*)).
It was pretty clear in IBM's acquisition announcement that they are only
interested in RH as a cloud services company and do not care at all about
RHEL, let alone Fedora. The word "Linux" did not show up a single time in
the whole announcement!
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
