Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <[email protected]> said:
> Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here, aren't a 
> per se problem because they can't modify the file system. So they have no 
> complaints about that.

But those read-only drivers are incomplete and problematic, especially
as filesystems get more complex.  I've been bitten before by an
ill-timed unclean shutdown, where an update was still in the /boot ext4
journal but not comitted, so the system would not boot, because the
GRUB2 ext4 driver doesn't read the journal.

There should be _less_ put into GRUB2 filesystem support IMHO, not more.
No more complex filesystems; keep /boot something simple like ext2 that
GRUB2 can reasonably be expected to handle basically 100%, possibly
mounted read-only during normal operation, mount with "sync", and with
all updates as atomic as practical.

-- 
Chris Adams <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to