> > There is no problem technically; the Copr repo[2] is building > > Firecracker RPMs with musl. Maintainers of both Rust and musl seemed > > to be against it in Fedora. From this thread: > Why does Fedora not want to ship Firecracker statically linked to musl? > That is the supported and tested configuration upstream. Using glibc > or dynamic linking is not supported for production use.
Because glibc is Fedora's supported libc implementation and supporting two different implementations at the same time is complex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
