If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed:
Removing dependent packages:
ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 2.2 M
libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 9.6 M
libavdevice-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 228 k
libavfilter-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 4.4 M
libavformat-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 2.6 M
libavutil-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 836 k
libpostproc-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 127 k
libswresample-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 152 k
libswscale-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 632 k
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM Neal Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
> - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided
> by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
> - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> - conflicting requests
> Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64
> - conflicting requests
> - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free
> provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
> - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free
> provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
> - problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
> - libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> - firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>> > > > - problem with installed package
>> msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch
>> > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>> > >
>> > > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that
>> > package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-*
>> > subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the
>> > subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of
>> the
>> > other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib.
>>
>> I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some
>> subset of the subpackages.
>>
>> Zbyszek
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
>
> --
> *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
>
--
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
