On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James <[email protected]>
...
> I found a problem related with yarnpkg rpm, the macro % __find_requires
> finds that yarn scripts uses and needs /usr/bin/node , which is added
> to the requires of rpm [1] and this makes yarnpkg pull nodejs (18) even
> when nodejs20 is installed .
> To avoid this rpm automatic requires, we may add to yarnpkg.spec [2]
>
> [2]
> %global __script_requires %{nil}
>
>  [1]
> dnf repoquery yarnpkg --available --requires -q
> /usr/bin/bash
> /usr/bin/node
> /usr/bin/sh
>

I'm not sure what you think is a bug here? Do you think `yarnpkg`
should use *any* nodejs version that's installed? The whole point of
the way this is broken down is that we have a default version (18, in
this case) with the option to install 16 and 20 in parallel, but you
have to do extra work if you want to *use* those non-default versions
(such as patching shebang lines).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to