> Am 21.01.2023 um 11:19 schrieb Casper <[email protected]>:
> 
> I usualy disable systemd-resolved on my servers, because it is not
> working well...
> 
> For disabling, I use /etc/resolv.conf file which is the main
> entrypoint for administrators.
> 
> ...
> I would like systemd stop overwriting my config. In my case, servers
> are not working when systemd-resolved is enabled.

Obviously my post from earlier today got lost, probably due to issues with the 
mailing list today.

By providing your own /etc/resolv.conf you do not *disable* systemd-resolved, 
if it’s that what you really want to achieve. It’s just a part of it. You would 
have to

[—]# systemctl stop systemd-resolved
[—]# systemctl disable systemd-resolved 
[—]# rm /etc/resolv.conf
[—]# vi /etc/resolv.conf
<insert>
domain <YOURDOMAIN>.  # optional
search <YOUR SEARCHPAFH>  #optional
nameserver <NAMESERVER_IP>
nameserver <BACKUP_NAMESERVER_IP>
< save&quit>

In that case NetworkManager takes over to manage /etc/resolv.conf. If you don’t 
want this, too, you have to

[—]# vi /etc/NetworkManager.conf

[main]
dns=none


However, all of this is not advisable. Rather, my question is, what exactly 
doesn’t work well. We are aware of issues with libvirt  virbr0 virtual network 
interfaces and various parts of systemd. One of them is systemd-resolved and 
specifically split DNS resolving.





--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
[email protected]

Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)


Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora docs team contributor
Java developer and enthusiast


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to