On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:22 AM Neal Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > > The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version > would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The > potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally > consistent in their naming.
Flatpaks require RDNN naming (because AppStream does), which is often part of the upstream source code already for AppStream data. So this is *usually* not an issue. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
