I'm inclined to vote -1, if everyone keeps DT_HASH around I doubt Epic will fix the issue. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
- glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it for F37+) Neal Gompa
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it fo... Leigh Scott
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it fo... Kevin Kofler via devel
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving i... Kevin Kofler via devel
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preservi... Gary Buhrmaster
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving it fo... Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preserving i... Jan Drögehoff
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (preservi... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH (pres... Jan Drögehoff
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_HASH ... Neal Gompa
- Re: glibc 2.36 and DT_H... John Reiser
- Re: glibc 2.36 and ... Demi Marie Obenour
