On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 12:46:08 PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not saying a human would literally open each file manually. Tools
like 'licensecheck' can automate scanning and reporting from license
headers. Packagers should sanity check its output and examine any
cases
where it failed. That's sufficiently accurate to fill in the License
header in the RPM spec as requested by the new guidelines IMHO.
Even that would be an unreasonable effort. I only look at the output of
fedora-review's license check if the source project is small and the
output looks readable. For any complex project, it's beyond what humans
can plausibly handle.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
