Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not,
>> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot
>> configured to always bootnext to Windows?
>
> Pretty sure shim still hard codes the name grub$arch.efi as the 2nd
> bootloader. Hence having to rename sd-boot as grubx64.efi for shim to find
> and run it. They can't co-exist right now. Also, there's no current plan
> by anyone to add systemd-boot for Secure Boot signing.
That is not what I suggested.
I suggested shim → GRUB → systemd-boot → Windows (and shim → GRUB → Fedora,
systemd-boot would be configured to always reboot to Windows, booting Fedora
from GRUB would bypass it entirely), not shim → systemd-boot → Windows.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
