Ben Beasley <[email protected]> writes:
> I support deprecating openssl1.1. We definitely shouldn’t be adding any
> new packages that depend on it.
>
> However, dropping the -devel package is almost as drastic as simply
> retiring the OpenSSL 1.1 package altogether. Grepping spec files for
> 'BuildRequires:.*openssl1' turns up the following packages that would
> immediately FTBFS:
>
> - anope
> - baresip
> - botan2
> - ceph
> - chatty
> - dotnet3.1
> - dsniff
> - eggdrop
> - erlang
> - kf5-kdelibs4support
> - libasr
> - libqxt-qt5
> - libre
> - libretls
> - lua-sec
> - nginx
The openssl11-devel BuildRequires in ngnix is in a conditional and has
been building with OpenSSL 3 for a while.
%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >= 8
BuildRequires: openssl-devel
%else
BuildRequires: openssl11-devel
%endif
> - nodejs
Similarly for nodejs, openssl11 is conditional on building for RHEL.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
