Charalampos Stratakis <[email protected]> writes: > So I presume then that python2.7 in Debian works flawlessly with > OpenSSL 3.0.0, no regressions, no security issues and no ABI problems > right?
I'm hearing hostility from you and I don't know why. From your sarcasm, I take it to mean that no, you haven't looked. So my original question of "can we adapt this to Fedora" still stands. I'm confused that you're asking me to do this legwork for you, given I neither represent Debian in any way nor am I a Python developer, but since it's not hard to check... https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=python2.7 here is the Debian bugtracker for python2.7. The only openssl bug present there is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954418 (i.e., upstream https://bugs.python.org/issue40018 ) which, as it affects python3 versions as well, isn't relevant to this discussion. https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python2/-/tree/master/debian/patches here is the patches Debian carries for python2.7. All but one of them are backports from upstream, mostly by Christian Heimes <[email protected]>. Commit logs say that the backport was performed by Stefano Rivera <[email protected]>, and applied by Matthias Klose <[email protected]>. If it were me in your shoes, I would ask them how things have gone and for any pointers in potentially applying the backport yourself. Be well, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
