On Thu, 26 May 2022 at 11:32, Kevin P. Fleming <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/26/22 11:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > 2. Are there ways that a non-TCK compliant version could be distributed? > > I would suggest phrasing that slightly differently: the version being > distributed could very well be fully compliant (would pass the TCK if > tested), but may not have been tested. > > Yes, that goes into the my misunderstanding of what TCK is. Some systems can only say they are 'compliant' if they are 'certified' and anything else is 'fraudulent'. Others allow for 'complaint' and 'certified' to be different. In either case, I should have clarified with 'certified'. > -- > Kevin P. Fleming > He/Him/His > Principal Program Manager, RHEL > Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
