Once upon a time, Gary Buhrmaster <[email protected]> said:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:29 PM Chris Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to make ALL the new tags be SPDX:<tag>, at least for
> > an interim period (of years most likely) where both old and new tags are
> > allowed?
> 
> I don't think that is going to work unless the rpm spec
> file support would be backported to previous releases
> (without another macro that tries to do some magic).
> And the goal for some of us is to have one spec file
> work across all currently supported releases.

I'm not talking about a new tag or format, just literally making the
License: tag be "SPDX:<foo>".
-- 
Chris Adams <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to