Hans de Goede wrote:
> As the Source0 provider for the packages and then next to:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2
>
> Add a:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2-bios
>
> And moving the build of all sub-packages which are
> only necessary for BIOS support to the second src.rpm.
>
> This way the Legacy BIOS SIG could maintain
> the grub2-bios src.rpm (and binary pkgs it builds).
Would it not make more sense to rename the locked down grub2 SRPM that will
become UEFI only to grub2-efi and let grub2 be the BIOS one, to match the
naming of the binary RPMs (which are already split)?
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
