On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > Hi, > > apparently some broken packages have landed in rawhide: > > DEBUG util.py:444: Error: > DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides mpich-devel(x86-64) = 3.4.1 needed > by petsc-mpich-devel-3.16.5-2.fc37.x86_64 > DEBUG util.py:446: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable > packages) > > AFAIU, somebody has pushed an incompatible upgraded for mpich and forgotten > to take care about its dependency.
That someone would be me. But I wasn't aware that petsc binds to an exact version of mpich. I see this was added by Antonio last year. Antonio, why is this necessary? Isn't the so-version enough? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
