Neal Gompa wrote:
> The pull request to delete the code for BIOS support in lorax means
> that we can't produce media with BIOS support at all once that's
> merged. They've tied dropping syslinux to dropping BIOS support
> entirely. It is also unclear that they'd take a contribution to rewire
> lorax to produce media with BIOS support using GRUB like we do for
> UEFI.
So the change is actually already being implemented without approval? This
kind of forcing facts turns the whole change policy to the absurd.
As I understand it, dropping support in Lorax affects both livemedia-creator
and livecd-creator, so the only way forward to build ISOs that actually boot
would be to fork Lorax. Unless we can reuse some other distro's tools
instead.
The liveinst part of Anaconda can be replaced with Calamares, but ISO
composing (which can be done with (livemedia-creator) or without Anaconda
(livecd-creator), but both code paths end up in Lorax eventually) is not in
the scope of Calamares.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
