Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> I see in this table that there are still a bunch of languages using
> non-Noto fonts where there appears to be a Noto equivalent available,
> e.g., https://fonts.google.com/noto shows me Devanagari, Bengali, and
> Tamil on the first page whereas your table indicates that Lohit fonts will
> continue to be used there. What is the reason for that? Are the Noto fonts
> for those scripts incomplete? I think using Noto wherever possible would
> lead to a more consistent experience.
Another case is the math symbols: Should the default sans-serif math font be
changed to Noto Sans Math? STIX is a serif font, so it probably makes sense
to keep as the serif math font (also considering that there is, at least at
this time, no Noto Serif Math). For cases where the distinction matters,
see, e.g., the summation sign (clearly visible serifs), the integral sign
(dots at the ends that are a form of serifs), or the partial derivative sign
(constant stroke thickness in Noto Sans Math vs. variable in STIX).
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
