On Friday, December 3, 2021 7:25:19 AM CET Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Friday, December 3, 2021 12:33:58 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 15:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 12/2/21 15:08, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > I didn't understood . What is the difference for /lib64/ld-2.33.so
> > > > or
> > > > /lib/ld-2.33.so ?
> >
> > rephrasing my question :
> > What is the difference of /usr/bin/ld.so for /lib64/ld-2.33.so or
> >
> > /lib/ld-2.33.so ?
>
> /usr/bin/ld.so will have the same absolute path, regardless of glibc version.
And /usr/bin also appears in default ${PATH} unlike /lib or /lib64.
> Kamil
>
> > > The lib64 one is 64-bit and the lib one is 32-bit.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
