On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:58:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Whenever this topic has come up, I've see lots of this, except people don't > say the first part out loud: "Of course _I_ use GitHub for most of my stuff, > because of all of the advantages — but Fedora, Fedora should never." We > can't let ourselves be held by that.
At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge primarily, with GitHub only as backup. e.g. https://fennel-lang.org/ uses SourceHut with a GitHub mirror (with a wiki sadly still on GitHub, but that's a minor matter). > I don't think Gitlab open core is ideal. But I think it's closer than > GitHub. And I deeply believe that free software and real open source is > _just plain better_ as a model, and I think they'll eventually realize that > too. I think we could have a LOT more impact working WITH GitLab to move > towards an all-open model than we will continuing on the current path. > Speaking of GitHub, I should also note that some Fedora projects (just not packaging) are maintained there. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
