On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:30:40AM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I didn't complain. I'm not opposing, yet I'm acknowledging that it is
> not true that iwconfig is unused. It is very much used, if not just
> for printing the nice summary that the tool provides when called
> without arguments.

IIRC there are still a few WEXT-only drivers for obsolete wifi hardware 
in the Linux kernel. I don't know if Fedora builds them or not, but drop 
iwconfig and that hardware becomes unusable under Fedora.  (prism2_usb 
comes to mind)

Meanwhile, the default summary output of 'iwconfig' is all I have used 
it for in many, many years.  It is _very_ useful in a way that no other 
tool has been. (not unlike the default output of ifconfig _still_ being 
more generally useful than 'ip')

I'm sure all of the info that iwconfig provides can be extracted from 
iw, but it's a lot less convenient.  (Plus some of us have muscle memory 
going back to when iwconfig was the new hotness...)

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy                        pizza at shaftnet dot org (email&xmpp)
                                      @pizza:shaftnet dot org   (matrix)
High Springs, FL                      speachy (libra.chat)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to