On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:50:44PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 15:48 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> > This shows the minimum changes needed to:
> > - have openssl3-libs parallel installable with openssl-libs (tested in
> > mock for x86_64)
> > - mark the base, devel, and perl subpackages as conflicting
> > - openssl3 and openssl both ship binaries in %{_bindir}
> > - ditto with openssl3-perl and openssl-perl
> > - openssl3-devel and openssl-devel both ship headers and includes
> > with the same names
> >
> And of course I forgot to paste in the commit:
> https://gitlab.com/michel-slm/openssl3/-/commit/3649e51f898dbe1d97695cd8aca206c262a03617
> It's been 2 days, so I'm assuming I'm not doing anything insanely silly here. I've put up the package for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2022907 cc:ing Sahana who is driving the OpenSSL 3 migration in Fedora. Sahana, would it make sense to have this in Fedora 34 and 35 as well? Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
