This change won't be applied, so no action is required. Ondrej
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:14 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Simo Sorce wrote: > > >> SQLite is a general-purpose tool. Not every use of SHA-1 is > >> cryptographically relevant. Most uses in the context of SQLite probably > >> aren't, so the removal just annoys users for no good reason. > > > > Note that this is a Sqlite decision, from RHEL engineering we only > > requested the removal in digital signatures and where integrity > > protection is required for security. > > Also note that we do not require full removal, just that SHA-1 is not > > used unless users intentionally change configuration. > > How does this affect users of NSS who have created "default" databases, > eg using certutil -N ? Do these use SHA1? If so, can they be migrated > to SHA2? Automatically ? > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
