> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:31:07PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> While you might have no choice, I'd caution that there a few traps
> with using Epoch, not just with Koji. One particular trap is that
> subpackage dependencies like:
>
> %package devel
> ...
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> will break because the dependency should be:
>
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>
> More insidious is that things like:
>
> Obsoletes: oldpackage < %{version}-%{release}
>
> will silently do the wrong thing.
Oops, good catch! I've updated that and rebuilt again.
>
> If you had the choice of moving to upstream 1.9.1, I'd do that instead.
Unfortunately, upstream only releases on their own timetable and this can
sometimes be years between versions. I was hoping to use that, as well, but
with 1.9.0 out just in Autumn of last year it's unlikely we'll see a 1.9.1
before the Fedora 36 release going by past releases. Upstream mostly just
builds off of SVN HEAD for their own purposes and development moves very slowly.
--Greg
>
> Rich.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
