> > The issue here is that there's not a way to describe the SRPM license > separate from the binary RPM license. So that information is important > for SRPM distribution. >
But Licensing Guidelines make clear that the License: field refers to the binary packages not source ones. BR, Andrea
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
