On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over > to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no > big deal. However it's not really feasible to support both. Since I > maintain several other fuse-using packages in Fedora, we have to pick > one or the other. > > I notice also that almost no other packages have moved to fuse3: > > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse.so.2()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' > | sort -u | wc -l > 62 > > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfuse3.so.3()(64bit)' --qf '%{name}' > | sort -u | wc -l > 7 > > Are we going to deprecate fuse2 at some point? Encourage upstreams to > upgrade? > > One other minor point: BSDs can emulate fuse (which is essentially a > Linux-only API), but their emulation seems to be of fuse2 only. > > Rich. > > [1] > https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c74c7d7f01975e708b510e518895088fc61b5623 > [2] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0 >
I think we eventually want everything moving to fuse3, but that's a *slow* process... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
