On 12.01.2021 21:20, Brian C. Lane wrote:
Who is going to use this feature? My guess is a very limited set of users, so it seems unfair to dramatically increase the size of their downloads and install footprint to support something they don't use. Can't they be shipped on the side? An rpm of signatures that's optionally installed would be more user friendly.
+1. I think a separate -signature subpackage in a separate repository (as already done with -debug{info,sources}) would be better.
If the user needs per-file signatures, they can enable fedora-signatures repository and install all of them (a dnf plugin can be created to automate this process).
-- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
