On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:24 PM Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing > > depends on for running or building). > > Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal. > > > I've never ran that script looking for packages that nothing depends > > on, and I'm not sure I'm looking at the output correctly. > > Would I look at the "FTBFS (rawhide) (not depended on) (740):" > > section? Are those the leaves? > > Either leaves or only needed by other leaves. If you remove the entire group > at > once, there *should* be no impact outside of that group (however, conditional > requirements are not handled in a 100 % bulletproof way). > > > Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that > > is correct. It would be more ... > > > > dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v > > ^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources > > vi nodejs.sources # remove the non-noarch packages, any any others we need > > to > > python3 find_unblocked_orphans.py --skip-orphans $(cat nodejs.sources) > > Just curious: Do you have some example of non-noarch nodejs package? I > struggled > to find one:
nodejs-bcrypt _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
